PC PERSPECTIVE – The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G Review: Return of the APU using BAPCo’s SYSmark 2014 SE Benchmark

Ryan Shrout at PC Perspective reviews ”The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G” using BAPCo’s SYSmark 2014 SE benchmark.

According to PC Perspective, “In the overall score the Ryzen 5 2400G is slower than the Core i3-8100 despite having double the thread count. SYSmark continues to put a heavey emphasis on the responsive sub-set and score, and that in turn is very susceptible to clock frequency jumps and changes. In all of the tests, the 2400G outperforms the Ryzen 5 1400, and the 2200G does the same against the Ryzen 3 1200. That’s a good sign – and indicates that AMD is improving the Ryzen platform with higher clocks and a better Precision Boost 2 implementation.”

Head on over to PC Perspective for “The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G Review: Return of the APU” Review here.

Grab a copy of BAPCo’s SYSmark 2014 SE benchmark that includes the NEW “Responsiveness” scenario and Energy Consumption feature up at the BAPCo Store here.

Share thisShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on LinkedIn